CrewAI vs AutoGen vs LangGraph: Best Multi-Agent Framework Compared

Updated February 2026 · 15 min read

Multi-agent AI systems are transforming how we build intelligent applications. Instead of a single LLM doing everything, multiple specialized agents collaborate — one researches, another writes, a third reviews. The result is more capable and reliable AI systems.

But which framework should you use to build them? The three leading options — CrewAI, AutoGen, and LangGraph — take fundamentally different approaches. This comprehensive comparison will help you choose the right one.

What Are Multi-Agent Frameworks?

Multi-agent frameworks help you build systems where multiple AI agents work together. Each agent has a specific role, capabilities, and personality. They communicate to accomplish tasks no single agent could handle alone.

Common use cases include:

• Research: One agent searches, another summarizes, a third fact-checks
• Content creation: Writer, editor, and SEO specialist agents collaborating
• Software development: Architect, coder, and reviewer agents
• Customer support: Triage, specialist, and escalation agents
• Data analysis: Collector, analyst, and visualization agents

Framework Overview

CrewAI: The Easiest Entry Point

How CrewAI Works

CrewAI uses three core concepts:

• Agents: Individual workers with roles, goals, and backstories
• Tasks: Specific jobs assigned to agents
• Crews: Teams of agents that execute tasks together

from crewai import Agent, Task, Crew

# Define agents
researcher = Agent(
    role="Research Analyst",
    goal="Find accurate, comprehensive information",
    backstory="Expert at finding and synthesizing data",
    tools=[search_tool, scrape_tool]
)

writer = Agent(
    role="Content Writer", 
    goal="Create engaging, accurate content",
    backstory="Skilled writer who makes complex topics accessible"
)

# Define tasks
research_task = Task(
    description="Research the latest AI agent frameworks",
    agent=researcher
)

writing_task = Task(
    description="Write a comparison article based on research",
    agent=writer
)

# Assemble crew
crew = Crew(
    agents=[researcher, writer],
    tasks=[research_task, writing_task]
)

result = crew.kickoff()

Best Use Cases for CrewAI

• Content creation workflows (research → write → edit)
• Quick prototyping and proof-of-concepts
• Teams new to multi-agent systems
• Projects where role clarity matters

AutoGen: Microsoft's Flexible Framework

How AutoGen Works

AutoGen models everything as conversations between agents. Key concepts:

• AssistantAgent: AI-powered agents that generate responses
• UserProxyAgent: Represents humans or executes code
• GroupChat: Coordinates multi-agent conversations

from autogen import AssistantAgent, UserProxyAgent, GroupChat

# Create agents
researcher = AssistantAgent(
    name="Researcher",
    system_message="You research topics thoroughly."
)

writer = AssistantAgent(
    name="Writer",
    system_message="You write clear, engaging content."
)

user_proxy = UserProxyAgent(
    name="User",
    human_input_mode="NEVER",
    code_execution_config={"work_dir": "output"}
)

# Set up group chat
groupchat = GroupChat(
    agents=[user_proxy, researcher, writer],
    messages=[],
    max_round=10
)

manager = GroupChatManager(groupchat=groupchat)

# Start conversation
user_proxy.initiate_chat(
    manager,
    message="Write an article about AI frameworks"
)

Best Use Cases for AutoGen

• Research and analysis systems
• Code generation with execution
• Complex conversations requiring back-and-forth
• Human-in-the-loop workflows
• Academic and experimental AI systems

LangGraph: Production-Grade Control

How LangGraph Works

LangGraph uses a graph structure where:

• Nodes: Individual functions or agent actions
• Edges: Transitions between nodes (can be conditional)
• State: Shared data passed through the graph

from langgraph.graph import StateGraph, END
from typing import TypedDict

class AgentState(TypedDict):
    messages: list
    research: str
    draft: str

def research_node(state):
    # Research logic here
    return {"research": "findings..."}

def write_node(state):
    # Writing logic here
    return {"draft": "article..."}

def should_continue(state):
    if state["draft"]:
        return END
    return "write"

# Build graph
workflow = StateGraph(AgentState)
workflow.add_node("research", research_node)
workflow.add_node("write", write_node)
workflow.add_edge("research", "write")
workflow.add_conditional_edges("write", should_continue)

app = workflow.compile()
result = app.invoke({"messages": ["Write about AI"]})

Best Use Cases for LangGraph

• Production systems requiring reliability
• Complex workflows with branching logic
• Long-running processes needing checkpoints
• Systems requiring detailed observability
• Integration with existing LangChain projects

Deep Dive: Key Differentiators

Execution Model

CrewAI: Sequential or hierarchical task execution. Tasks flow from one agent to the next in a predefined order. The "hierarchical" process allows a manager agent to delegate dynamically.

AutoGen: Conversation-driven execution. Agents take turns speaking in a group chat, with a speaker selection strategy determining who goes next. Very natural for back-and-forth collaboration.

LangGraph: Graph-based execution with explicit control flow. You define exactly which node follows which, including conditional branches. Most explicit and controllable.

State Management

CrewAI: Automatic memory management. Agents remember context from previous tasks. Simple but less customizable.

AutoGen: Conversation history serves as state. All agents see the full conversation. Can add custom context through system messages.

LangGraph: Explicit state graph with TypedDict schemas. Full control over what data flows where. Built-in persistence allows pausing and resuming workflows.

Tool Integration

CrewAI: Tools are attached to agents. Uses LangChain tools or custom tools. Clean integration but agent-scoped.

AutoGen: Tools registered with agents. Strong code execution support — agents can write and run Python code. Best for computational tasks.

LangGraph: Tools can be part of any node. Full LangChain tool ecosystem available. Most flexible placement.

Human-in-the-Loop

CrewAI: Supports human input but it's not the primary focus. Can pause for human review.

AutoGen: First-class human-in-the-loop support via UserProxyAgent. Humans can participate naturally in agent conversations. Best for supervised workflows.

LangGraph: Interrupts and checkpoints allow pausing for human input. More programmatic than conversational.

Performance Comparison

We tested all three frameworks on a standard benchmark: Research a topic, write a 1000-word article, and review it for accuracy.

Key findings:

• CrewAI gets you to a working prototype fastest
• LangGraph is most efficient in production (fewer LLM calls)
• AutoGen shines when you need dynamic conversation flows

When to Use Each Framework

Choose CrewAI When:

• You're new to multi-agent systems
• You need a working prototype quickly
• Your workflow fits the "team with roles" mental model
• You value simplicity over control
• You're building content creation or research workflows

Choose AutoGen When:

• You need flexible, dynamic agent interactions
• Human-in-the-loop is critical to your workflow
• You're doing research or code generation
• You want agents to collaborate conversationally
• You need strong code execution capabilities

Choose LangGraph When:

• You're building production systems
• You need precise control over execution flow
• Reliability and observability are critical
• You're already using LangChain
• You need to pause/resume long-running workflows

Combining Frameworks

These frameworks aren't mutually exclusive. Common patterns include:

• Prototype in CrewAI, production in LangGraph: Use CrewAI to validate your agent design, then port to LangGraph for deployment
• AutoGen for research, LangGraph for orchestration: AutoGen agents do the exploratory work, LangGraph coordinates the overall workflow
• CrewAI + custom tools: Use CrewAI's simplicity with powerful custom tools for specific capabilities

The Future of Multi-Agent Frameworks

The multi-agent space is evolving rapidly. Key trends to watch:

• Standardization: Efforts to create common agent interfaces
• Specialization: Domain-specific agent frameworks emerging
• Integration: Better interoperability between frameworks
• Observability: More tools for debugging and monitoring agent systems

All three frameworks are actively developed with growing communities. Your choice today won't lock you into an abandoned ecosystem.

Getting Started

Ready to try multi-agent frameworks? Here's the fastest path for each:

Final Verdict

For beginners: Start with CrewAI. The role-based mental model is intuitive, and you'll have working agents in minutes.

For production: LangGraph provides the control and reliability you need. The steeper learning curve pays off in maintainability.

For research/experimentation: AutoGen's flexibility and human-in-the-loop features make it ideal for exploratory work.

There's no wrong choice — all three frameworks are excellent. Pick based on your use case, and don't be afraid to switch as your needs evolve.

Related Articles

• 10 Best AI Coding Agents in 2026
• Cursor vs GitHub Copilot Comparison
• LangChain — The Foundation for LangGraph